Skip to content
← All use cases

Industry guide / Neobanks

Make account questions easier to resolve.

A missing transfer, an unfamiliar card payment or a document that keeps getting rejected. Customers need an explanation tied to their account, with a clear next step.

Connect transaction context, account status and approved support procedures in one conversation.

01 / NeobanksIllustrative example

Explain a pending card payment.

The request

“The hotel says it cancelled my booking. Why is the payment still pending, and was I charged twice?”

The result / Example reply

There is one completed payment and one separate pending authorization for this booking. The pending amount is reserved, not a second completed charge. I found its expected release date in your account and opened a status follow-up under the bank’s support procedure. I’ll update this conversation when the status changes.

A clear explanation without sending the customer between the merchant and support.

See the work behind the reply
  1. Verify the customer in the secure account session and locate the two transaction records.

  2. Compare authorization, capture and reversal events, merchant references and the bank’s release window.

  3. Explain the difference using the recorded status, create an allowed follow-up and check for a later update.

What this workflow needs

Connected context

Card transaction ledger, merchant references, authorization events, releasable status information and follow-up tool.

Where the boundary sits

A bank or payment network controls the release of an authorization. Fraud reports and disputed completed charges follow the bank’s protected dispute process; the agent does not promise a refund.

02 / NeobanksIllustrative example

Trace a transfer across its processing stages.

The request

“My transfer shows completed, but the recipient hasn’t received it. Can you find where it is?”

The result / Example reply

The account record shows the transfer was sent; it does not yet confirm that the recipient bank credited it. I’ve retrieved the permitted payment reference, checked the processing window for this transfer type and created a trace request because that window has passed. You can follow the case here.

One timeline and one follow-up instead of repeated status requests.

See the work behind the reply
  1. Match the transfer to the verified customer and the correct recipient.

  2. Check the payment rail, sent/returned events, cut-off time and any published service incident.

  3. Provide the permitted reference and initiate a trace only when the configured conditions are met; track its result.

What this workflow needs

Connected context

Transfer ledger, processing events, applicable bank policy and trace-request endpoint.

Where the boundary sits

Sanctions, fraud or compliance review reasons are disclosed only when authorized. A trace request is not confirmation that funds arrived.

03 / NeobanksIllustrative example

Help complete an identity-check requirement.

The request

“I uploaded my proof of address twice. What do I need to change?”

The result / Example reply

The customer-visible status says the document is missing its issue date. I’ve opened the secure upload step and listed the accepted document requirements for your account. Once you submit it, I can follow the review status here.

A precise correction rather than another generic upload request.

See the work behind the reply
  1. Read the permitted rejection category and requirements for the customer’s country and account.

  2. Explain the exact missing field without exposing internal screening notes.

  3. Direct the customer to secure upload and check submission status.

What this workflow needs

Connected context

Verification status, customer-visible reason codes, country-specific document requirements and secure upload flow.

Where the boundary sits

The identity provider or authorized compliance team makes the acceptance decision. Documents, passwords and verification codes are not collected in a public chat.

04 / NeobanksIllustrative example

Resolve a card-usage issue from the recorded reason.

The request

“My virtual card works online but was declined for a subscription renewal. What should I do?”

The result / Example reply

The recorded decline relates to the card used for the recurring payment. I found the bank’s guidance for this card type and linked the secure card settings. After you update the merchant’s saved payment method, I can check whether a new attempt was recorded.

Useful troubleshooting tied to the failed attempt.

See the work behind the reply
  1. Inspect the recorded decline code, card type and payment attempt in the verified session.

  2. Match the reason to the bank’s approved guidance, account restrictions and service status.

  3. Guide the permitted settings change and check the next recorded attempt.

What this workflow needs

Connected context

Card configuration, decline events, product guidance and secure settings links.

Where the boundary sits

The agent does not bypass a security block, initiate a payment or request full card details.

One system, improving over time

Resolve the exception.
Keep the useful procedure.

Tessolva’s proposed improvement loop turns verified resolutions into reusable guidance. Private details are removed, the procedure is validated and tested, and approved guidance can help the AI handle a similar request next time.

Investigate → Resolve → Remove private details → Validate & test → Reuse

Your team handles critical decisions, missing permissions and genuine exceptions. Complexity alone does not mean the request needs a person.

Reference topics

Public documentation helped inform these support topics. Examples use fictional data and your own policies would apply. These references do not indicate partnerships or available Tessolva integrations.

Built around your business

What should your support agent resolve?

Bring us a recurring request and the tools behind it. We can explore the right workflow, connections and boundaries.

Discuss your workflow